Both of those are far inferior to Photoshop's implementation of keyboard and menu editing, however. If you're looking for a similar solution to these issues, you've got the aforementioned option of editing translated strings, although I think you could also create something in AutoHotKey that would also work. To at least address the muscle memory issue, I’ve had to shift a bunch of my Photoshop shortcuts to more closely match Lightroom’s, although this is an imperfect option. Given how closely these two programs work together, it doesn’t make sense to throw out your muscle memory when jumping between them. When you jump back to Lightroom and need to tweak that crop, you’d expect it to still be C, right? Nope. In Photoshop, it’s the C key, as in Crop. Consider cropping, a fundamental tool for most edits. Want to remap a shortcut? You can dig into the “Translated Strings” text file, which is buried in the program files, and rewrite some of the strings yourself, but this isn’t exactly user-friendly or well supported.Įven more confusingly, the defaults between LR and PS don’t align. Lightroom, by contrast, supports none of these functions. Best of all, these settings can then be saved and reused via a small file, making them portable and easily backed up. The menus themselves can be customized via recoloring and hiding. Not only can you modify the keys used for all the menu options, but also the panels, tools, and even task spaces like Select and Mask. Photoshop’s support for remapping keyboard shortcuts is fantastic. Furthermore, as much as I’d love to see support for more obscure features like astro-stacking, these are basic essentials. What’s particularly surprising to me about the lack of these features is how commonplace they are in both other tools and Adobe’s own software tools.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |